|
I was
invited by the Indian head of a multinational
organization to conduct a series of leadership
and team building programmes. After the
preliminary niceties were shared, we got down to
the business end of the meeting.
“Leadership and team building mean different things
to different people” I began, “it encompasses a
whole world view and a philosophical base”. The CEO
looked very interested and a bit perplexed. “Can you
tell me what you mean?” he asked. “One of the
authors who comes close to the way we hold
leadership in TAO is Daniel Goleman. His book
“Primal Leadership” outlines many basic ideas very
lucidly”. The CEO’s eyes lit up “Primal Leadership
that’s right!” he said. “I want leaders to lead
teams that will walk over bodies to accomplish their
goals.”
I was
more than just a little surprised. I thought that
the days of the Rambo models of leadership were
gone. “Let me try and understand what you mean” I
began, “you want gladiators completely dedicated to
the mission, wiling to brook no opposition”. “Yes”
he said. “Give me an example”. “Alexander” was the
prompt one word reply.
“Alexander was the head of a tribe at a time when
all tribes were racially homogenous, indoctrinated
in the same ideology and completely trapped within
their dependencies. We have evolved far beyond this.
Teams are not only not homogenous often they are
virtual, each one comes from not only varied
backgrounds, but, even these are multifaceted.
Lastly, each one has many options in the market”.
The CEO was quiet for a few minutes. “The positives
I see in Alexander era tribal heroism are dynamism,
courage and a spirit of adventure. However, tribal
cultures are extremely competitive, have linear and
rigid world views, look for enemies and are
predatory. A strong self centered “what in it for
me?” is a dominant motivation and this can easily
become envy. I can see that you are battling
bureaucratic apathy and dysfunctional status
seeking. May be what we need to search for is a
strong purpose that attracts each member in a deeply
meaningful way, a quality of interface characterized
by mutuality and commitment and a fair degree of
autonomy that lets each one contribute through an
exercise of their competencies. The leader of
today’s team need not be charismatic, but, he must
touch each person’s heart and mind. The team cannot
be bound by loyalty, but by the pursuit of a shared
and elevating purpose”.
I
recommended to the CEO that he watch two films –
Rambo and Invictus after which we would have a
discussion. The CEO heeded my advice, the next
discussion focused on Nelson Mandela and Gandhiji.
We spent a long time discussing intent, dreams and
the human condition. Gurucharan Das’s book “The
difficulty of being good” was an important part of
the conversation. We decided that the CEO and I
would have a few more conversations to decide what
meaning of leadership and team building would be
appropriate and requisite for his organisational
context.
<< Back |